Saturday, May 7, 2022

We should please Lord only ( Mathew6:1-18)

Let us please Lord only---

Matthew 6:1 Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven.

2 Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

3  But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth:

4  That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly.

5  And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

6  But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

7  But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.

8  Be not ye therefore like unto them: for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of, before ye ask him.

9  After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.

10  Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.

11  Give us this day our daily bread.

12  And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.

13  And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.

14  For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you:

15  But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

16  Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

17  But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face;

18  That thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mathew one of the 12 disciples who is also called the tax collector, wrote the Gospel of Mathew. Most scholars believe the gospel was composed between AD 80 and 90, with a range of possibility between AD 70 to 110; a pre-70 date remains a minority view.

 

The Gospel According to Matthew consequently emphasizes Christ's fulfilment of Old Testament prophecies (5:17) and his role as a new lawgiver whose divine mission was confirmed by repeated miracles.

 

In the context of Matthew 6, Jesus continued His Sermon on the Mount. He taught that righteous acts of devotion should be done for the right reason and emphasized that they should be done to please our Heavenly Father. 

 

The common theme through these paragraphs will be easy to identify. Jesus was warning people not to do righteous acts (Verse 1) for the purpose of being seen by people. He was instructing people that if a righteous act was done for God alone, and was not tarnished by this desire for recognition and applause, it would be rewarded by God. That is genuine piety. But if it was done to be seen by other people, then that acclaim was all the reward that would be received. So, His instruction was that it is best to hide any righteous acts that may lead to ostentation and thereby ensure that they will be done for God.

 

Verse 2 then gives the first case, giving to the poor, with a warning not to do it like the hypocrites do. Then verse 3 gives the positive instruction, to do it secretly, and verse 4, the reward. There are many reasons people can come up with to avoid this spiritual duty. Prosperity theology fits into the reasoning as well, teaching that if people had faith they would have wealth, because God wants His children to be rich. This is not the place to deal with this theology, other than to say it is unbalanced at best. What is most disturbing is to see the wealthy and the successful being paraded on Christian talk shows on television or on stage in services as if they were the spiritual ones, blessed by God.

 

So, Jesus said that when people try to give money to the poor they should not “sound the trumpet” as the hypocrites do in order to be recognized and honoured by others (6:2-4). There are a number of ideas about the meaning of “sounding the trumpet” in the literature, none of which can be established with certainty from primary sources. But the point is clear that the hypocritical almsgiver was more concerned about being noticed for his deed than for helping the poor. One very plausible suggestion is that this form of giving was connected with the public fasts that were proclaimed by trumpets. At such times of fasting, prayers were recited in the streets and alms were given to ensure the efficacy of the prayers and fasting. This would mean that such folks were choosing the most opportune moment to display their “generosity,” so that others would consider them to be truly spiritual. Such individuals were also deceiving themselves into thinking that they were acting in the best interests of God and man--the large gifts would be well received by the needy, and their praise and gratitude would feed their egos, and everyone else would see them as the “pious” in action. But Jesus was saying not to do this. Those who do this would receive no reward from God, because it was all hypocritical.

 

Rewards. Sooner or later, you will have to deal with the theme of “rewards” in the Bible. This is really difficult to get right. On the one hand the Bible warns people not to do these things for the praise and honour you would get from other people; and on the other hand, it instructs people to run the race for the reward. There is nothing wrong with doing a righteous deed for the sake of receiving a reward, or praise, as long as the praise you seek is of God. On occasion people will say that true piety means doing something without any consideration of reward. That would have to be qualified, because when we are instructed in the Bible to do acts of righteousness there is always a mention of reward from the Father in heaven. There has to be a motivation for the righteous deeds, and at the bottom of all this discussion would be that our chief Now this is very different than doing something so that others in the church will praise you or think more highly of you than they should.

 

The third matter the Lord told in Verse 5 to 15, regarding meaningful prayer, Jesus taught to pray with sincerity and avoids vain repetitions. Heavenly Father knows our needs before we pray. We can follow Jesus Christ's example by praying for Heavenly Father's will to be accomplished. We can receive Heavenly Father's forgiveness as we choose to forgive others. The part of the prayers Jesus taught;” let the God’s Kingdome come and let God’s will be done on earth, both just like it is in heaven. This means we will pray like this for all people to live in peace and love with each other, the way it is in heaven. It reminds us that we should live the way God wants us to live every day.

 

This is the longest of all the sections because it includes the Lord’s Prayer. The case of praying with a warning,The hypocrites do (v. 5), instruction on spiritual prayer (v. 6), a second warning not to pray like the pagans (v. 7), and an explanation of spiritual prayer (v. 8).

 

The next section, verses 9-15, is the Lord’s.  Jesus taught this prayer. The Case of Praying like the Hypocrites. Jesus said that the hypocrites love to stand in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others (Matt. 6:5). Here too the Lord was describing someone who may or may not be sincerely praying, but certainly wants everyone to know he prays. Jesus was not ruling out public prayer; rather, He was criticizing the motivation of the hypocrite.

 

Prayer is a spiritual matter between the one praying and God. To do it for show is to pervert what it is all about. So, in verse 6 Jesus instructed to make it private by going into your room (not on the streets), and to keep it personal by praying to your Father (not to be seen by others). A good test to use would be this: if someone prays frequently in public, on stage, in front of gatherings, but not at home in private, then there is probably something wrong with the motive.

 

In another place Jesus took this a step further. He spoke of the Pharisee who went up to the temple to pray. He stood up “and prayed to himself not to God: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other men--robbers, evildoers, adulterers--or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week and give a tenth of all I get’” (luke 18:11). This one Jesus said would not be justified by God, for whoever exalts himself will be humbled. People like this have their reward in their public show. But God does not consider this to be righteous.

 

God also does not require or honor such devices to break through to Him. Nor does He need endless detailed information. Jesus said to avoid these practices, or thinking that the longer prayers or additional muttering would “work.” Jesus said, “Your Father knows what you need before you ask him.”

 

The first request is Hallowed be your name.” Here you will have to study two things: the meaning “holy” and the meaning of “name.”

 

The second request is “Your kingdom come.” This request logically follows the previous, for when the kingdom fully comes God will be seen as the one whose word can be trusted. So this request ultimately looks forward to the consummation of the age.

 

Vine, Branches and Fruit (John 15:1-10)

 The Lord is vine and we are branches 

John 15:1  (KJV)

1.I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman.

2  Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.

3  Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you.

4  Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me.

5  I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.

6  If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.

7  If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you.

8  Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples.

9  As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in my love.

10  If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.

 

The Gospel John was written between 85 ce to 92 ce and written by  John the most loved disciple of the Lord Jesus Christ. In the above chapter 15:1-10 the Author, John has stressed that Lord is the true vine and God the father is a husbandman. He has explained about the Branch and vine and fruit in the vine. He has stressed that the branch abide in Vine is fruitful and the branch which does not abide with vine cannot bear fruit. John has explained about Father (God), vine (Jesus), branch (Believer), fruit (fruitful life in Lord). He also stressed for believer to keep on abiding in vine to bear fruit and also danger of fruitless vine to be casted into the fire. John expressed that bearing fruit will glorify the name of His father (God) and he further explained that Jesus loved us the way father loves us and it you keep His commandment we shall abide in His love. He witnessed that He has kept the commandment of God and abiding in His love.

 

While physical fruit is always appealing and satisfying to man’s flesh, it stands nowhere in comparison to the deep beauty of the spiritual fruit that can be produced in the life of a Christian. The fruit in the follower of Christ comes because a Christian enjoys a link with God through Christ, that makes it all possible. You are somebody if you are in Christ because you are a branch of Christ, the vine. 

 

In John 15:1–10, we find a wondrous description of the relationship between the Savior and the saved. Christ compared the relationship to that of a vine and its branches. This comparison helps us to understand better our tie to Christ and the need to work to keep the tie strong, and the results of the strong tie. Let’s look together at this passage with keen interest as we find four important principles concerning life as a branch in Christ, the vine. 

 

1. Christ is source of our spiritual life. The way branch receives its nutrients and moisture from the soil through the vine, the Christian draws his spiritual nourishment through Christ. Being branches, we have an important responsibility in maintaining this connection/link with Christ. The Lord, in verse 4, commands His followers to abide in Him and in verse 10 tells us that if we keep Christ’s commandments we will abide in His love. The principles, the standards, the instructions found in the New Testament are the key to abiding in Christ. If our life is in harmony with them, our spiritual life in Christ will be strong. 

 

2. Fruit will follow virtues in the life of the believer. If we abide in Christ and He in us, then fruit will be produced. A plant is at its peak of beauty when it is either full of blossoms (expecting fruit) or laden with fruit and likewise when we truly abide in Christ and allow Him to work in us, we are at our peak of beauty. Our attitudes and actions are attractive to behold and pleasing to be near, to God and to those around us. Even the most brilliant sunrise, the loveliest flower does not compare to the beauty of one person who gives his life to Christ and bears fruit for Him. The greatest sight to see is one who once was chained to sin but now has been freed to live in Christ. What is this fruit? Examine Galatians 5:22–23, the inner qualities listed are described as either being fruit or resulting in fruit. The fruit that should follow are attributes or virtues developed in the life of a believer.

 

3. The Lord will prune the fruitful to bear more fruit. During our child hood days we have seen that our elders of the family would prune the fruit trees. There used to be a thought in my heart that the fruit tree is pruned much and will be damaged. But I have seen that many of those same trees are still standing and bearing fruits today. Why? Because our elders knew what they are doing when they are pruning them. Likewise, our Heavenly Father knows when He prunes us, so that we will bear more fruits” (verse 2). What would we be like if we never had disappointments, discouragement, pain, or trials? How grateful would we be, pray and study? How much would we feel a need for God? As James put it, we should count it all joy when we face such tests (James 1:2). God is pruning us. He “cuts on our character” so that we might be better people and bear more fruit for His glory. 

 

4. The danger of unfruitful is being cut off. In the natural realm we see that the fruitless branch is cut off, why? Because it stopped producing grapes. What will happen to those of us who bear no fruits being in Christ? They will be taken away from the vine and will be destroyed (verses 2 and 6). The fruitful relationship we can enjoy only when we are attached to Christ. To abide in Christ means to grow and produce/bear much fruits. If we cease to grow and produce, we will eventually be cut off. How blessed we being a branch on the vine of Christ and father being Husbandman. Because of this link only our life can be a fruitful one, one that is glorifying to God, helpful to others and meaningful to us.

 

Let us always abide in Him. 

The Lord is my Shephred

 Psalm (KJV23): 

1. LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.

2. He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.

3.  He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name's sake.

4.  Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.

5.  Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over.

6. Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the LORD for ever.

 Message

================================================================

David likely wrote Psalm 23 during his kingship, which began over the tribe of Judah in 1000 BC.  King David lived approximately between 1040-970 B.C. and he was the king of Judah between 1010-970. So, it is likely that Psalm 23 was written during that time. There are two main Characters i.e. David and Lord in the Psalm. David, a shepherd boy, who wrote this Psalm and he was later known as the Shepherd King of Israel. He wrote this Psalm taking into account how the sheep would think and feel about his/her shepherd and brings about a profound yet practical working relationship between a person and the Creator and Saviour.

 

In Psalm 23, David expresses the God that He is worthy of Trust at all times. We can just divide the Psalm in the following was to explain it.

 

1.The Lord is Shepherd:

David addressed Lord as Shepherd in this Psalm.  I understand that the David might been influenced here by the earlier Old Testament passages in which the Jacob says that “May the God in whose presence my fathers Abraham and Isaac walked, The God who has been my shepherd from my birth to this day (Genesis 48:15) and he is addressing the God as Shepherd here. More over the David himself was a shepherd and well aware about the carefulness of the shepherd towards his sheep.

David says in the First verse that the “Lord is my shepherd and I shall not want” Since He himself was shepherd and was knowing, how to take care of sheep, so he affirmed that he shall not lack anything and moreover the Lord the Shepherd is much higher than that of the shepherded who shepherd he sheep only.

 

2.The Shepherded Sustains:

In the second verse he says, the LORD as a shepherd he knew how to make David rest when he needed it, just as a literal shepherd would care for his sheep. The implication is that a sheep doesn’t always know what it needs and what is best for itself, and so needs help from the shepherd. The shepherd knows when the sheep needs green pastures, and knows when the sheep needs the still waters. This state of Lord the Shepherded explained by David has great sense of comfort, care, and rest which he claims in this verse.

 

3.The Shepherded Leads:

In third verse David says Lord the shepherd “Restores” and the same may picture the straying sheep brought back. “He leads me” The shepherd is explained as a guide and He leads also. The Lord also led in “the path of righteousness” in the way of holy obedience. He says that, we are strengthened to walk and run in the paths of God’s commandments “For His name’s sake” displays the glory of his grace which is not on account of any merit in us. He explains the God’s motives of conduct towards the children of men, is derived from the perfections and goodness of His own nature.

 

4.The Gift of presence of Shepherded:

In the fourth verse David brings the first dark note in this beautiful psalm although he previously wrote of green pastures and still waters and paths of righteousness. David recognized that under the shepherd’s leading, he may walk through the valley of the shadow of death but the same is not his destination or dwelling place. I understand that a shadow is not tangible but is cast by something that the shadow of death because Jesus took the full reality of death in our place.  David could resolutely say this because he was under the care of the LORD his shepherd. Even in a fearful place, the presence of the shepherd banished the fear of evil.

 

The rod and the staff seem to be two names for one instrument, which was used both to beat off predatory animals and to direct/protect the sheep/sheep getting strayed.” These instruments (or instrument) David explains bring a comfort and God’s guidance through correction. It is a great comfort to know that God will correct us when we need

 

 

5.The Lord as Host:

Without departing from the previous picture of the valley of the shadow of death, David envisioned the provision and goodness given by the LORD as a host, inviting David to

rich table prepared for him. David gives a beautiful picture, table suggests bounty, prepare suggests foresight and care, before me suggests the personal connection.

The goodness and care suggested by having prepared the table, set right in the midst of the presence of my enemies. The host’s (Lord the Shepherd) care and concern doesn’t eliminate the presence of enemies even but enables the experience of God’s goodness and bounty even in their midst. This is the condition of God’s servant, always conflict, but a table is spread before them always. Nothing is hurried, there is no confusion, no disturbance, the enemy is at the door and yet God prepares a table, and the Christian sits down and eats as if everything were in perfect peace.You anoint my head with oil, my cup runs over David say, despite the dangers and the presence of enemies, David enjoyed the richness of his host’s (Lord the shepherd) goodness. He felt as refreshed with the head anointed with oil as well as his cup was over-filled.

 

The Blessing for future:

The host’s (Lord the Shepherd) care brought the goodness and mercy of God to David, and he lived in the faithful expectation of it continuing all the days of his life. And I will dwell in the house of the LORD forever: The psalm ends with the calmest assurance that he would enjoy the presence of the LORD THE SHEPHERD forever – both in his days on this earth and beyond.

Tuesday, April 12, 2022

UNPARDONABLE SIN ?

 INTRODUCTION

 

                Many Bible students and believers of Scripture have been faced this serious sin and often wondered several questions: What is the meaning of this? Is it possible today or was possible only during the time of Christ was on the earth? While all of these questions cannot be answered in great detail for the sake of space, this paper will address a number of these questions as well as other aspects that relate to the meaning of the unpardonable sin.

Reformed theologian view

                  When Protestant Reformation came forward, totally new and authentic directions are received in Bible research. Scripture was exalted during this time and many issues in the Bible were reexamined in light of an authoritative standard. Luther (1483-1546), in his commentary on 1 John 5:16, described the blasphemy of the Spirit as, “obstinacy in wickedness, an assault against the acknowledged truth and impenitence to the end, of which Matt 13:22 speaks.”[1] Luther elsewhere spoke on Matthew 12:31-32 stating that, “sinning against the Holy Spirit is nothing else than blaspheming His work and office.”[2] Luther adds, “It is the nature of this sin against the Holy Spirit to resist what is known to be plain truth.

            John Calvin (1509-64) rejects Augustine’s interpretation of final impenitence and insists that the sin could indeed be committed during one’s life and not simply at the end of it. Calvin states his own position more directly when he writes, “they sin against the Holy Spirit who, with evil intention, resist God’s truth, although by its brightness they are so touched that they cannot claim ignorance. Calvin reasons that the one’s committing this continual rejection/blasphemy of the Spirit will not be forgiven because God hardens their hearts so that they will never desire to repent.[3]

James Arminius (1560-1609), like Calvin, rejected Augustine’s final impenitence view for the same reasons Calvin did; namely, Christ’s words would be made void that the sin would not be forgiven in this age. Arminius defines the blasphemy of the Spirit as, the rejection and refusing of Jesus Christ through determined malice and hatred against Christ. In other words, the blasphemy of the Spirit is rejecting Christ even thought it has been made undeniable to the sinner. The sinner does this for the purpose of fulfilling his or her flesh by indulging in the deeds of the body rather than choosing Jesus.

BIBLICAL VIEW

                    Some theologians deny the existence of an unpardonable sin stating that these words were fabricated by the early church to support their own endeavors. Such a view is simply to be rejected on the basis of insufficient evidence.

         Augustine’s “end of life impenitence” has some holes and the chief difficulty, as Combs writes, is “that it has little correspondence with the historical situation in the Gospels. The convicting ministry of the Spirit is available to all unbelievers. Thus, “since all unbelievers end up rejecting the convicting ministry of the Spirit, all unbelievers also become guilty of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. Jesus’ statement is thus stripped of all its solemnity.

The view that espouses that the unpardonable sin was a possibility limited to the earthly ministry of Jesus has commendable aspects but is still insufficient in its explanation. The problem with this is that the biblical record does require Jesus to be present in order for the sin to be committed. Indeed, Luke 12:10, in a speech Jesus gives to prepare his disciples for his absence, assumes that the unforgiveable sin will happen during the ministry of the disciples, even after Jesus has ascended.

            The view that espouses that the sin can still be committed. Furthermore, since one can never really know if a person has reached the point of true blasphemy and thus the state of unforgiveness, thus view virtually becomes synonymous with Augustine’s view.[4] 

A PROPOSED INTERPRETATION

                     Three passages specifically mention the unpardonable sin: Matthew 12:22-32; Mark 3:22-30; and Luke 12:10.   For the research paper, a brief study of only Matthew’s account will be studied along with a complimentary word from Mark’s account. Matthew dividing into four main points that relate to the unforgivable sin.  

The Situation (Matt 12:22-23)

                First, Matthew explains the situation in verses 22-23 stating, “Then a demon-possessed man who was blind and unable to speak was brought to Him. He healed him, so that the man could both speak and see. It is the view that miracleS authenticate God’s messengers and the same appear only when God is speaking to His people through accredited messengers, declaring His gracious purposes.”[5] Thus, the miracles performed by Jesus and his successors authenticated their message as truly from God.

 Charge of Pharisees (Matt 12:24)

The second main division is in verse 24. Matthew writes, “When the Pharisees heard this they said, ‘The man drives out demons only by Beelzebul, the ruler of the demons.’ The most significant thing to point out is actually a confession of Pharisees that Jesus had done miracle by Beelzebul

Refusal by Jesus (Matt 12:25-30)

A third section emerges in verses 12:25-30 is “Jesus’ Refutation”. It should be noted that Jesus’ refutation consists of four main points. First, Jesus begins his defense by pointing out the absurdity of the charge of the Pharisees. “Knowing their thoughts, He told them, ‘Every kingdom divided against itself is headed for destruction, and no city or house divide against itself will stand. If Satan drives out Satan, he is divided against himself. How then will his kingdom satan?

            Jesus makes a second point in his argument by pointing out the inconsistency of the Pharisees’ argument. In verse 27 Jesus says, “And if I drive out demons by Beelzebul, who is it your sons drive them out by? For this reason, they will be your judges.” In the first century, exorcism was accepted and practiced among the Jews, even among the Pharisees. The logic follows that the religious leaders would have to conclude that their “sons” were doing the same thing - that is, if the Pharisees wanted to maintain logical consistency. Jesus’ third main point in his rebuttal to the Pharisees is that their false charge against him only distorts the truth. The logical and true explanation that the Pharisees should have concluded was that Jesus was casting out demons by the Spirit of God. Jesus’ exorcisms were genuine; the Pharisees never denied that. Since Jesus has shown that a connection with Satan is impossible (v.25—27), the only conclusion that can be reached is that he is casting out demons “by the Spirit of God.”[6] Jesus concludes his argument with a warning in verse 30. He states, “Anyone who is not with me is against me, and anyone who does not gather with me scatters.  

Charge of the Blasphemy (Matt 12:31-32)                                                                                            

Having finished his rebuttal, Jesus makes one of the harshest, statement in the gospel. MacLeod puts it well when he writes, “Up to this point Jesus has responded defensively explaining the importance of the healing he had just performed with the power of the Holy Spirit. Now he adopts a more offensive posture.”[7] Jesus says to the Pharisees, “Because of this, I tell you, people will be forgiven every sin and blasphemy, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it will be forgiven him. But whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the one to come.” Several things stand out from the passage and would be helpful in determining the meaning of this passage. Thus, the implication is that the blasphemy of the Spirit is equated with the accusation of the Pharisees.[8]

Second, verse 31 also helps determine what the blasphemy of   the Spirit is not. In this verse Jesus draws a line between sin in general and a very specific sin, the blasphemy against the Spirit. Jesus’ wording is very careful. Combs observes, “the addition of the words ‘and blasphemy’ to those sins which will be forgiven serves to make even more specific the nature of the sin which will not be forgiven.”[9] Lastly, verse 32 advances the thought started in verse 31, bringing it to a sharper point. Warfield explains, what follows is not merely an illustration of the general principle or a consequence from it. The “and” has an ascensive force and introduces what is in effect a climax. It is not merely an instance which is adduced; but the instance, which will illustrate above every other instance the incredible reach of forgiveness that is extended, and which will therefore supply the best background up against which may be thrown the heinousness of blasphemy against the Spirit which cannot be forgiven.[10] But why is this sin unforgiveable? Why is blasphemy against the Spirit unforgiveable as opposed to blasphemy against the Son? It will be argued later that blasphemy against the Spirit is unforgiveable due to the nature of the sin itself.

Mark 3:22-30

                Mark 3:22-30 is almost unanimously viewed as a parallel passage to Matthew 12:22-32. The two can be harmonized with little difficulty; thus, time will not be given to examine the entire passage, as was the case for Matthew’s. What will be examined, however, is Mark’s account of the charge of blasphemy (vv. 28—29) and Mark’s unique explanatory comment (v. 30). First, Mark’s account of Jesus charging the Pharisees with blasphemy against the Spirit will be examined. Mark records Jesus’ words in verses 28-29, “I assure you: People will be forgiven for all sins and whatever blasphemies they may blaspheme. But whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin.” The charge is virtually the same as Matthew’s account. Mark chooses not to record but records the same conclusion. Whoever blasphemes the Spirit has no opportunity for forgiveness. It should be noted that the last clause in verse 29, “but is guilty of an eternal sin,” is confirmatory and not in contrast to what Jesus has just said. Gundry suggests translating the “but” as “indeed” or “rather.”[11]

            The second thing that is necessary that the scribes who had come down from Jerusalem said, ‘He has Beelzebul in Him!’ and, ‘He drives out demons by the ruler of the demons!’ Thus, “He has an unclean spirit” in verse 30 is synonymous with the scribes’ charge in verse 22: “He has Beelzebul in Him!” This this harsh charge of blasphemy was given as a result of what the Pharisees said in verses 22 as explained by Mark in verse 30. John Wesley agrees when he writes, “Is it not astonishing, that men who have ever read these words, should doubt, what is the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost: Can any words declare more plainly, that it is the ascribing those miracles to the power of the devil which Christ wrought by the power of the Holy Ghost.”[12] Verse 30 provides the student with the cause for why Jesus endeavored in his argument and ultimately his charge to the Pharisees that they were guilty of blasphemy against the Spirit. Combs writes, “The reason Jesus issues his solemn pronouncement in vv. 28—29 is because of the blasphemous accusation of the scribes that he was performing exorcisms by the power of Satan.

                                                                  CONCLUSION                                                                                                                                          The paper then put forth a proposed interpretation that defined the blasphemy of the spirit as attributing the miraculous works of the Holy Spirit to Satan. Three concluding remarks to tie everything together would be helpful at this point.

            First, blasphemy of the Spirit, should properly be understood as blaspheming the miraculous undeniable working of the Holy Spirit which Pharisees were accusing Jesus of doing miracles by the power of Satan.

            Second, what is significant about this specific blasphemy as opposed to other blasphemies is its nature. This is not merely a one-time act or some sort of slip of the tongue, as it were. Müller explains, “It is impossible for a man, as if by mere magic of certain words, which do not spring from the depth of his heart, to commit the very worst of all sins, and to abandon himself irremediably to eternal ruin.”[13] Combs wittingly points out what is going on in the hearts of the Pharisees. He writes, “The charges made by the Pharisees were not the accusations of well-intentioned men. Jesus’ refutation of the charges made by the Pharisees, as recorded by both Matthew and Mark, pointedly demonstrate how ridiculous and absurd the Pharisees’ charges were.”[14] Their charge was an attempt to dispute the indisputable and to deny the undeniable. Whitcomb observes the purpose of sign miracles when he writes that they “were presented to human minds with such force and clarity, that no one was to deny them.”[15] The Pharisees and scribes had been shown undeniable proof that Jesus’ claims about himself were true and willfully chose to be ignorant.                                                                     

                    Third, it is safe to say that the unpardonable sin cannot be committed today. It was concluded that the Pharisees committed the blasphemy of the Spirit when they attributed the miracle working power of the Spirit to Satan. Therefore, a necessary element that must be present in order for the unforgiveable sin to occur is Spirit-worked, sign miracles. Assuming that cessationism is true, which the present author does, it would follow that the unpardonable sin could not be committed today.

            In conclusion, the blasphemy of the Spirit is the willful ignorance that attributes the miracle-working power of the Holy Spirit to Satan. It is knowingly denying the undeniable. It is not an accidental slip of the tongue nor is it a sin that lacks knowledge of the facts. It is contingent upon the working of sign miracles, which leave no room for debate. Assuming cessationism is true, beginning with the death of the last apostle, it is impossible for the sin to be committed today. This does not mean, however, that the sin will never be committed again. Possibility exists when, or if, sign miracles are ever reinstituted in God’s redemptive plan.  



[1] Jaroslav Pelikan, ed., The Catholic Epistles, in vol. 30 of Luther’s Works, p. 325.

 

[2] Edward M. Plass, comp., What Luther Says, 3 vols. (St. Louis: Concordia, 1959),

 

John Calvin, Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, 3 vols., Baker, 1979), 2:77. 

[5] Benjamin B. Warfield, Counterfeit Miracles (reprint ed., Grand Rapids: Baker, 1971), p. 25-26.

     Combs, “The Blasphemy Against the Holy Spirit,” 76.  

 

    Willoughby C. Allen, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel Accor

    Combs, “The Blasphemy Against the Holy Spirit,” 77.

    Benjamin B. Warfield, “Misconception of Jesus, and Blasphemy of the Son of Man,” Princeton

Theological Review 12 (July 1914): p. 400.

   Robert H. Gundry, Mark (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1993), p. 176.

 

[12] John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament, 10th ed. (New York: Carlton and Porter, 1856), p. 105.

   Jullius Müller, The Christian Doctrine of Sin, trans. William Urwick, 2 vols. (Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1885), 2:419.

   Combs, “The Blasphemy Against the Holy Spirit,” 94.

   John C. Whitcomb, “The Limitations and Values of Christian Evidences,” Bibliotheca Sacra 135 (January-March 1978): p.   

   25. 

Faith—The Substance of Things Hoped For

  Main Text: Hebrews 11:1–2 -  “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. For by it the elders obta...